@prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> .
@prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> .
@prefix mi: <https://taxonomy.materialinstruments.com/ns#> .
@prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> .

<https://taxonomy.materialinstruments.com/id/mood/luxurious>
  a skos:Concept ;
  skos:inScheme <https://taxonomy.materialinstruments.com/id/axis/mood> ;
  skos:prefLabel "Luxurious"@en ;
  skos:definition "Expense legible and intended to be read as expense; the declared opposite of quiet luxury."@en ;
  skos:related <https://taxonomy.materialinstruments.com/id/tier/market/luxury> ;
  mi:relation [ mi:predicate "related-to" ; mi:target <https://taxonomy.materialinstruments.com/id/tier/market/luxury> ] ;
  mi:searchedWithout [ dcterms:date "2026-10-21" ; mi:query "luxurious" ; mi:scheme "aat" ; mi:via "https://vocab.getty.edu/sparql" ] ;
  mi:sourceBasis "authored" ;
  dcterms:source "@instruments/taxonomy ADR 0001" ;
  mi:status "active" ;
  skos:scopeNote "Authored here. ms_mood carries only the quiet register, but four estate terms (`art-deco-luxe`, `Contemporary Luxury`, `residential_luxury`, `hospitality_luxury`) mean the loud one, and collapsing them into `quiet_luxury` would invert their sense. TWO OF THOSE FOUR ARE NOT SETTLED: `residential_luxury` and `hospitality_luxury` read equally well as sector plus TIER - a luxury-tier hotel project rather than a room that looks expensive - and their source dictionary describes itself as routing handles, which does not decide it either way. They are left pointed here because that is where they were found, and recorded as ambiguous rather than resolved by guess. The same declining move as `Modern`."@en .